Report comment

The 48 per second frame in some 3D films is to try and help stop giving people problems viewing 3D. But what the industry does not understand is that the audineces and many film makers do not want 3D. How many times do we need stuff popping out at us to say "oooh" This may make children laugh but after a while it feels flat. Action sequences just don't work in 3D. There has been other official surveys showing audiences do not want 3D. The point here is that the film studos and certain persons with great power are pushing 3D on the basis of money. Cinemas are forcing audiences to view films in 3D and put normal vison films into less or smaller screens. There are tv stations who have closed their 3D tv stations as audiences are not taking it up. Does anyone remember the the story of "The Emperpors Clothes" ? Go check it out, reminds me of the 3D bandwagon. Oh and look at the box office figures and see how many normal vision films are making a huge amount of money. As I've said before 3D is a gimmick and is frustrating everyone. Unfortunately companies have invested in 3D equipment and need to get their investment back. My only other question on this is, why are so many throughout the film industry sitting on the fence on the 3D issue?