California attorney general Rob Bonta has outlined the terms of agreement with Paramount after the parties announced on Monday that they had settled the antitrust case.
The development, which is understood to have occurred on Sunday night after at least a week of negotiations, clears the final hurdle in Paramount’s proposed $111bn acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery (WBD).
Ellison and his team have agreed to legally-enforceable terms that include a $1.5bn spend in US production over the first five years of the merger, and a combined slate of 30 features a year for the first two years, rising to 32 over the following three years.
While there is no immediate requirement for Paramount to divest itself of corporate assets under a structural remedy, should the merged company fall short of its annual output goals it will be subject to two penalties. Bonta said the combined company would be required to divest itself of Miramax; and pay $30m for each film below the agreed-upon level, 90% of which will go to entertainment industry workers and the 10% balance to a bipartisan national attorneys general fund to enforce ongoing antitrust enforcement.
Bonta, who has been the figurehead in the antitrust lawsuit brought by 12 states against the proposed merger, said in a press conference on Monday morning that the settlement would protect Hollywood workers and their livelihoods, protect competition, and create more choice.
He stressed on several occasions that he did not support the merger, saying: “This was a meat-and-potatoes, black-and-white, bread-and-butter antitrust case and we got a strong antitrust outcome: more production, more choice, and guardrails that keep this industry competitive. I don’t think these two companies should merge, but that’s not something that we are focused on with our resolution.”
He added, “This agreement is the opposite of all the things we saw in the Disney-Fox merger – a massive decrease in film production, in film output, less films being made. This doesn’t just guard against that, it locks in a massive upside.”
In a statement Ellison said “Our shared aim was an outcome that best serves consumers, workers and — most importantly — the creative community so vital to the art of visual storytelling. We’re confident this agreement does exactly that, memorialising a series of commitments that include 30+ films annually and expanded U.S. film production to help revitalise our industry here at home.”
Scroll to bottom for full statement
Under the terms of the settlement Paramount has additionally agreed to:
- keep its lots in Los Angeles and not sell them (following reports that Ellison had been contemplating a relocation should the merger not go through);
- establish “guardrails” around separate Paramount and WBD negotiations with cable providers and exhibitors to ensure consumer prices are in the words of Bonta “fair and affordable”;
- establish a news editorial independence board to support CBS News and CNN; and
- pay $9.5m annually for workforce training and career development in film and television production, and for film programmes and community arts organisations.
A trustee will be nominated to monitor Paramount’s compliance with the terms. Ellison and his team will now race to complete the merger before October 1, when a ticking fee of approximately $7m a day and $650m a quarter kicks in, payable by Paramount to WBD shareholders. The CEO told staff in a memo he expected the merger to close within two weeks.
Writers Guild of America has also settled its antitrust case after negotiating separately with Paramount. Its suit was due to be heard alongside that of the state attorneys general at a trial on March 2, 2027. The Guild said as part of the settlement Paramount has agreed to prohibit writer lay-offs at CBS News for five years, and to pay $17.5m to the Guild’s health fund, plus attorney fees in the litigation. The WGA said it remained opposed to the merger.
Screen has reached out to exhibitors group Cinema United and had not received a statement at time of writing.
Statement from Paramount chairman and CEO David Ellison
“We are grateful to Attorney General Bonta and his fellow AGs, as well as the WGA, for engaging in good faith to find a path forward to a resolution that serves all parties, and to Governor Newsom for his support throughout this process. Our shared aim was an outcome that best serves consumers, workers and — most importantly — the creative community so vital to the art of visual storytelling. We’re confident this agreement does exactly that, memorialising a series of commitments that include 30+ films annually and expanded U.S. film production to help revitalise our industry here at home.
”Our goal has always been to build a stronger Hollywood — one with more stories told, greater choice for consumers and stronger competition. That vision was validated by unanimous approval from competition authorities in nearly 70 jurisdictions worldwide, who agreed this deal is pro-competitive, pro-consumer and pro-worker. Having now addressed the State AGs’ and WGA’s concerns, we have complete clearance for this merger and look forward to putting these commitments into action. Bringing Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery together will build that stronger Hollywood, creating expanded opportunity for our people and even more great entertainment for audiences around the world.”
WGA East and West statement
”We continue to believe the merger will cause damage to writers and the industry at large. Now that the Attorneys General have settled with Paramount, however, as a nonprofit, the WGA must contend with the reality of forging ahead alone, with no backing from government enforcers, with a complex antitrust lawsuit that would cost millions of dollars to pursue through trial. Consequently, we have also settled our lawsuit with an agreement from Paramount to prohibit writer layoffs at CBS News Broadcast for 5 years, and to pay $17.5 million to our health fund along with our attorneys’ fees in the litigation.
“Though we were not successful in blocking the merger, our advocacy brought more attention to the harms that this merger—and others like it—will cause. We will continue to fight the harms of industry consolidation.
“As the number of outlets to sell our work to and the corresponding diversity of programming shrinks, we need industry-wide structural separation between streamers and studios in order to promote competition in programming, like the Financial Interest and Syndication Rules once required in broadcast television. We will continue to fight for these goals.”
No comments yet